Bloopers

A physician, an engineer, and a lawyer were discussing which of their respective professions was the oldest.

The physician said: “Remember that, on the sixth day, God took a rib from Adam and fashioned Eve, making her the first surgeon. Therefore, medicine is the oldest profession.”

The engineer replied: “But, before that, God created the heavens and earth from chaos and confusion, and thus she was the first engineer. Therefore, engineering is older than medicine.”

Then, the lawyer spoke up: “Yes, but who do you think created all of the chaos and confusion?”

_________________________________________

Courtroom Bloopers

Q. What is your brother-in-law’s name?

A. Borofkin.

Q. What’s his first name?

A. I can’t remember.

Q. He’s been your brother-in-law for years, and you can’t remember his first name?

A. No. I tell you I’m too excited. (Rising from the witness chair and pointing to Mr. Borofkin.) Nathan, for God’s sake, tell them your first name!

_________________________________________

Q. Did you ever stay all night with this man in New York?

A. I refuse to answer that question.

Q. Did you ever stay all night with this man in Chicago?

A. I refuse to answer that question.

Q. Did you ever stay all night with this man in Miami?

A. No.

_________________________________________

Q. Doctor, did you say he was shot in the woods?

A. No, I said he was shot in the lumbar region.

_________________________________________

Q. Are you married?

A. No, I’m divorced.

Q. And what did your husband do before you divorced him?

A. A lot of things I didn’t know about.

_________________________________________

Q. Do you know how far pregnant you are right now?

A. I will be three months November 8th.

Q. Apparently then, the date of conception was August 8th?

A. Yes.

Q. What were you and your husband doing at that time?

_________________________________________

Q. Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?

A. All my autopsies have been performed on dead people.

_________________________________________

Q. Were you acquainted with the deceased?

A. Yes, sir.

Q. Before or after he died?

_________________________________________

Q. What happened then?

A. He told me, he says, “I have to kill you because you can identify me.”

Q. Did he kill you?

A. No.

_________________________________________

Q. When he went, had you gone and had she, if she wanted to and were able, for the time being excluding all the restraints on her not to go, gone also, would he have brought you, meaning you and she, with him to the station?

MR. BROOKS: Objection. That question should be taken out and shot.

_________________________________________

Q. What is your relationship with the plaintiff?

A. She is my daughter.

Q. Was she your daughter on February 13, 1979?

_________________________________________

Q. And what did he do then?

A. He came home, and next morning he was dead.

Q. So when he woke up the next morning he was dead?

_________________________________________

Q. Could you see him from where you were standing?

A. I could see his head.

Q. And where was his head?

A. Just above his shoulders.

_________________________________________

Q. Do you drink when you’re on duty?

A. I don’t drink when I’m on duty, unless I come on duty drunk.

_________________________________________

Q. …any suggestions as to what prevented this from being a murder trial instead of an attempted murder trial?

A. The victim lived.

_________________________________________

Q. Are you sexually active?

A. No, I just lie there.

_________________________________________

Q. Are you qualified to give a urine sample?

A. Yes, I have been since early childhood.

_________________________________________

Q. What is the meaning of sperm being present?

A. It indicates intercourse.

Q. Male sperm?

A. That is the only kind I know.

_________________________________________

Q. Was that the same nose you broke as a child?

_________________________________________

Q. Now, doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, in most cases he just passes quietly away and doesn’t know anything about it until the next morning?

_________________________________________

Q. Was it you or your brother that was killed in the war?

_________________________________________

Q. Do you have any children or anything of that kind?

_________________________________________

Q. I show you exhibit 3 and ask you if you recognize that picture.

A. That’s me.

Q. Were you present when that picture was taken?

_________________________________________

Q. Were you present in court this morning when you were sworn in?

_________________________________________

Counsel: Now, in your report under “Foundation” you indicated that there is a minimum of cracking and no signs of settling.

Witness: Yes.

Counsel: When you say there is a minimum of cracking, I take it that you did find some cracking.

Witness: No. Because if I said there was no cracking, I would be in court just like this answering some stupid lawyer’s questions. So I put “minimum” in there to cover myself, because somebody is going to find a crack somewhere.

The Court: I could say I would like to shake your hand, but I won’t.

Counsel: Move to strike —

The Court: No. We are not going to strike it.

Counsel: Move to strike the word “stupid,” Your Honor.

The Court: The most appropriate word you want stricken? It is worth the whole trial.

_________________________________________

Counsel: Do you recall approximately the time that you examined the body of Mr. Edgington at the Rose Chapel?

Witness: It was the evening. The autopsy started at about 8:30 P.M.

Counsel: And Mr. Edgington was dead at that time, is that correct?

Witness: No, you dumb **. He was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy.

_________________________________________

The Court: In this case the request is made for the appointment of the psychologist for the performance of an IQ test. The court does not see the need for an IQ test since it appears to me that he is dumber than a fencepost.

Counsel: Has the court stated it in numerical terms?

The Court: His IQ is less than zero.